Individual Grants

Review Criteria

Context & Objectives

The proposal's objectives are clearly positioned within the "bigger picture" of the disciplinary frame or wider context.

Method & Strategy

The proposal clearly explains the methodology and/or strategy to achieve meaningful outcomes and objectives.

Scale & Scope

The proposal achieves meaningful learning outcomes in the award period without interfering with regular coursework and extracurricular obligations, including a timeline of activities.

Relevance

The proposal advances the student’s academic goals and/or professional aspirations.

Additional Criteria for Individual Grants

91´«Ã½ & Materials

The proposal makes thoughtful, efficient use of available resources.

Originality & Creativity

The demonstrates originality of thought and creativity in approach and project design.

Ìý

Ìý

Scoring Scale

You have some concerns about the project moving forward.
  • 1. Poor
  • 2. Marginal
  • 3. Fair
You're confident about the project moving forward but see potential for improvement.
  • 4. Satisfactory
  • 5. Good
  • 6. Very Good
You're very confident about the project moving forward and see little to no potential for improvement.
  • 7. Excellent
  • 8. Outstanding
  • 9. Exceptional

Back

Review Board

Celebrating 40 Years

91´«Ã½ has an expansive history engaging undergraduates in the research and creative life of the campus dating to the creation of UROP in 1986.